Skip to content
GreenFuel Hydrogen

Pillar 1 of 5 · kills: Grid power after sunset

Near-zero grid dependency. 22 hours a day, 95–100% solar.

Six hours of concentrated sunlight, stored as heat in fluid and sand, run a PEM electrolyser for twenty-two.

Modelled saving

₹60–80/kg

40–60% grid electricity0–5%

2 · The mechanism

Curved-panel concentrators capture 15–20% more energy than flat panels at the same footprint, sized for Punjab's 5.5 and Odisha's 5.2 kWh/m²/day. Direct power drives the electrolyser through the day; the surplus does not go to a battery.

It goes into two thermal stores. Under-panel fluid storage (an Exowatt-type approach) absorbs excess heat during peak generation and releases it for four to six hours after sunset. A sand battery — industrial by-product sand heated to 500–600 °C — holds a deeper reserve for the morning ramp and any shortfall, with a 25-year life and no degradation cliff.

The electrolyser is the fourth layer. A PEM unit in the H-TEC ME450 class runs at ~74% efficiency (HHV), starts in about ten minutes rather than an hour, and follows a varying solar input without penalty. It is modular: capacity grows from 1 MW to 3 MW per site by adding stacks, and future improvements arrive as bite-sized upgrades rather than plant replacement.

Concentrator cross-section with under-panel fluid channel and sand batteryA curved concentrator panel focuses sunlight onto a receiver. Beneath the panel a fluid channel carries excess heat to a store. A sand battery beside it shows charge, hold and discharge with a temperature gradient from night blue to flame red.Under-panel fluid channel → store15–20% higher capture · supplier specChargeHoldDischargeSand battery · 500–600 °C · 200 kWhHeat ramp: night → charge → flame
Schematic · not to scale

3 · The components

Everything on this page is bought, not invented.

Components, suppliers and maturity
What is usedWho makes itMaturity
PEM electrolyser, 1 MW, 450 kg/dayH-TEC SYSTEMS class (in discussion)Commercial, 25-yr track record
Curved-panel solar concentratorsIndian EPC supply (in discussion)Commercial
Under-panel fluid thermal storeExowatt-type approachPilot-proven, US
Sand battery, 200 kWhPolar Night Energy-type (in discussion)Commercial, Finland
Plant control and power electronicsStandard industrial supplyCommercial

Supplier names given by class. Partners are in discussion unless a written agreement exists; none is implied as an endorsement.

4 · The numbers

₹60–80/kg from grid elimination, plus ₹25–30/kg from PEM efficiency

Basis. Modelled against a 40–60% grid-dependent plant buying industrial power at Punjab and Odisha tariffs.

Sensitivity. A 10% shortfall in irradiance costs roughly 1.5 hours of autonomy before the two-hour margin is touched; the saving holds above ₹55/kg.

22hours/daymodelled
95–100% solar
0–5%modelled
vs 40–60% industry
~74%HHVsupplier spec
vs alkaline 60–65%
19%capacity utilisationmodelled
vs 16–17% industry
4–6hours post-sunsetmodelled
hours post-sunset
6–8hours backupmodelled
hours backup

5 · What we still need to prove

  • 01Integrated thermal handover — direct solar to fluid to sand — has not yet been run as one control loop on one site.
  • 02Sand-battery-to-electricity round trip at our scale needs a measured, not modelled, efficiency figure.