Skip to content
GreenFuel Hydrogen

Pillar 3 of 5 · kills: Water purification cost

Local clean water, not desalination.

We choose sites where the water is already clean, and we use an electrolyser that needs a third less of it.

Modelled saving

₹12–17/kg

₹15–20/kg₹2–3/kg

2 · The mechanism

In coastal and industrial locations, desalination and purification take 8–12% of green hydrogen cost. Both our sites were selected for water first: Jalalabad sits on clean aquifers with spring water access; Khordha has groundwater and treated municipal supply at lower TDS than coastal clusters. Treatment is basic filtration plus DM processing — ₹0.50 per 1000 litres against ₹3–5 desalinated.

The plant polishes water to 18.2 MΩ through reverse osmosis and ion exchange at 90% recovery, and recycles 85–95% of process water in a closed loop. Daily draw is 6,240 litres per electrolyser for 450 kg of hydrogen.

PEM compounds the advantage: roughly 9 litres per kilogram of hydrogen against 12–15 for alkaline, a 33–40% reduction before any site advantage is counted.

Water path from source to 18.2 megohm with recycling loopWater flows from a borewell through filtration, reverse osmosis and ion exchange to 18.2 megohm purity and into the electrolyser. A loop returns 85 to 95 percent of process water; 10 percent is lost as RO reject.Borewell / springFiltrationROIon exchange18.2 MΩElectrolyserClosed-loop recycle 85–95% · modelled6,240 L/day per electrolyser · 90% recoveryRO reject ~10%
Schematic · not to scale

3 · The components

Everything on this page is bought, not invented.

Components, suppliers and maturity
What is usedWho makes itMaturity
Borewell / spring intakeLocal civil contractorStandard
RO + ion-exchange train to 18.2 MΩIndian water-treatment OEMCommercial
Closed-loop recycle and 6,500 L/day storageStandard supplyStandard

Supplier names given by class. Partners are in discussion unless a written agreement exists; none is implied as an endorsement.

4 · The numbers

₹12–17/kg

Basis. Water at ₹15–20/kg in a desalination-dependent plant against ₹2–3/kg here, including PEM's lower draw.

Sensitivity. A doubling of local water cost moves the saving by under ₹1/kg. The exposure is aquifer quality, not price.

₹0.50/1000 Lsite data
/1000 L
₹3–5/1000 Lindustry benchmark
/1000 L
~9L water/kg H₂supplier spec
vs alkaline 12–15
6,240L/day per electrolysermodelled
producing 450 kg H₂
90%recoverysupplier spec
recovery
85–95%closed-loop recyclingmodelled
closed-loop recycling

5 · What we still need to prove

  • 01Long-run aquifer quality at Jalalabad under sustained draw needs a hydrogeological study, not a sample.